Search found 7 matches
- Sun Apr 14, 2024 4:11 pm
- Forum: Feature Suggestions
- Topic: Address step on main table.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1534
Re: Address step on main table.
This is Major Stride. Setting Major stride to -1 causes the app to crash, while setting "address step" to -1 within a row/column perfectly reverses the order. In the example shown bellow i set the address step to -1 for the breakpoint column. https://img001.prntscr.com/file/img001/T2f04Oi...
- Wed Mar 27, 2024 5:00 pm
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: how to support multiple firmware versions in one Xdf?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1098
Re: how to support multiple firmware versions in one Xdf?
Hello everyone.I have a question for those who understand...take for example the EDC16c2 Mercedes...there are many versions of the software.That I need to create XDF separately for each software...or is it possible to somehow make support for many software in one file and the program itself will al...
- Wed Mar 27, 2024 4:55 pm
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: Bitmask editing fails
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2634
- Tue Mar 26, 2024 5:46 pm
- Forum: Feature Suggestions
- Topic: Address step on main table.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1534
Address step on main table.
Hello, a simple but quite needed feature. While we get address stepping for x/y axis which can be set to negative values and reverse the order of the values there, we can't do that on the main table. Value size is one thing, order might be different on some tables/roms.
- Fri Dec 22, 2023 7:18 pm
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: Bitmask editing fails
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2634
Re: Bitmask editing fails
Better to have a proper solution and not a bandaid. Tunerstudio has a nice approach on this
You can simply specify something like this in the configuration file:
[0:2]
[3:5]
[6:6]
[7:7]
You can simply specify something like this in the configuration file:
[0:2]
[3:5]
[6:6]
[7:7]
- Mon Dec 18, 2023 7:21 am
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: Bitmask editing fails
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2634
Re: Bitmask editing fails
I guess that's not something that would be in your near future todo list then. We have a mapping that contains a lot of bitwise values, unfortunately for us.
- Sun Dec 17, 2023 6:59 pm
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: Bitmask editing fails
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2634
Bitmask editing fails
Build: 5.00.9993.0 Hello, I am having a trouble editing 4 bits from a byte. I am using the bellow conversion: X >> 4 & 0x0F So let's say we have the byte 0x60, using the conversion above we read bits 0110, which converts to 6, the moment I am editing the decimal from 6 to 7 it sets the byte as 0...