8040, I guess time to upgrade.
Thanks.
Search found 21 matches
- Sat Jun 01, 2013 8:48 am
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: TunerPro unable to handle 8 bit data on RoadRunner
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8810
- Sun May 26, 2013 4:47 am
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: TunerPro unable to handle 8 bit data on RoadRunner
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8810
TunerPro unable to handle 8 bit data on RoadRunner
Trying to update a single 8 bit value fails with "Upload failed". Data tracing on 8 bit maps results in "Error". For 8 bit it only works if you select to upload whole maps and select a map that is 16 bit aligned and has an even number of values. If it has an odd number of values ...
- Mon May 28, 2012 12:04 am
- Forum: Feature Suggestions
- Topic: Category limit
- Replies: 3
- Views: 16812
- Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:35 pm
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: How to display ascii data?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 27849
- Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:17 am
- Forum: Feature Suggestions
- Topic: Category limit
- Replies: 3
- Views: 16812
Category limit
Hello, Currently TunerPro has a category (folder) limit. Only the first 100 categories can have names assigned. And only 255 categories are supported altogether, with names not shown for the rest. Could this be increased? Perhaps a lot? I don't really mind if I can't change their names in the UI, bu...
- Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:40 pm
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: How to display ascii data?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 27849
- Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:03 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: TunerPro and Address hit tracing with 16 bit emulation
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3571
TunerPro and Address hit tracing with 16 bit emulation
I know that TunerPro supports wiring two Ostrich emulators together to provide 16 bit emulation capability, but it does not support address tracing in a such mode.
Does TunerPro support address tracing on the Roadrunner emulator, which is a 16bit emulator from the get-go?
Does TunerPro support address tracing on the Roadrunner emulator, which is a 16bit emulator from the get-go?
- Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:35 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Bosch ECU - Problem with Row Labels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 39381
Then consider using Excel. Sure, that is not an issue at all. Don't take this wrong, I am not trying to whine or anything, just saying that if you want to change the axis parameters, then it is currently not really feasible to do so in TunerPro. I don't really mind, since I don't edit my XDF's by h...
- Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:12 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Bosch ECU - Problem with Row Labels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 39381
Of course it changes the others - the whole point of this axis design is that it cascades. Each cell uses the preivous cell's values. Yes, but that makes it completely useless for editing. You don't want to change all axes usually - perhaps the 2-3 last ones. I am changing one value - I don't want ...
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 1:06 pm
- Forum: Feature Suggestions
- Topic: Copy XDF Parameters
- Replies: 12
- Views: 24693
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:38 am
- Forum: Feature Suggestions
- Topic: Copy XDF Parameters
- Replies: 12
- Views: 24693
Am I missing something or how do you open multiple instances? When launching the second one, it always says that TunerPro RT is already running. However, it is possible to launch two instances... patch the check: Search for: 1C 00 75 44 6A 30 Replace with: 1C 00 EB 44 6A 30 And then you can open as ...
- Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:28 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Bosch ECU - Problem with Row Labels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 39381
- Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:58 am
- Forum: Bosch
- Topic: BMW ECU 352 750i two chips, one bin? HUH?!!
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10751
- Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:24 pm
- Forum: Bosch
- Topic: From hot wire to hot film with motronic 1.7
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6630
- Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:27 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Bosch ECU - Problem with Row Labels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 39381
Yeah, that I know how to do. It will just be annoying to create tables for each axis, but since I generate the XDF anyway, I can do it programmatically. Why is it any more annoying than defining the axis for the table that it's part of? Need to change my XDF generator more :P Also, the point of cre...
- Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:13 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Bosch ECU - Problem with Row Labels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 39381
- Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:32 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Bosch ECU - Problem with Row Labels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 39381
Use per-cell equations. First cell is: (256 - THIS()) * 40 All other cells are CELL(INDEX() + 1) - (THIS() * 40) How do I use a per-cell equation for an axis? Do you mean that I have to create a table for each axis and then link that table as the label source? That works, but seems a bit cumbersome.
- Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:31 pm
- Forum: Report A Bug
- Topic: Crashes with new math engine
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7420
Crashes with new math engine
Build 5.00.7004.00
Crashes if I enter the following into the formula box (axis formula) and press OK:
SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)+SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)+SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)+SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)+SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)
The following as well:
CELL(INDEX()-1;FALSE)
Crashes if I enter the following into the formula box (axis formula) and press OK:
SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)+SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)+SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)+SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)+SUM(1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9)
The following as well:
CELL(INDEX()-1;FALSE)
- Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:07 pm
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Bosch ECU - Problem with Row Labels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 39381
The math engine was updated, but every way that I come up with to do this in axis math crashes TunerPro. There just seems to be no way to reference the calculated value of the previous or the next cell. CELL(INDEX()+1;FALSE) or CELL(INDEX()-1;FALSE) both crash TunerPro. SUM() can not be given an add...
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:00 am
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Bosch ECU - Problem with Row Labels
- Replies: 23
- Views: 39381
- Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:44 pm
- Forum: TunerPro Discussion
- Topic: Dual Ostrich2 for 16 Bit Bosch MSA ECU's
- Replies: 8
- Views: 17880