Would like to get a 87 Turbo Regal .ads ALDL definition.

Discuss General Motors (GMC, Chevy, Pontiac, Hummer, Cadillac, etc) tuning topics here. Request definitions, discuss parameters, etc.

Moderators: robertisaar, dex

Post Reply
Turbo1dr
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:20 pm
Contact:

Would like to get a 87 Turbo Regal .ads ALDL definition.

Post by Turbo1dr »

If someone should happen to have a highly detailed one I'd REALLY appreciate a link or an e-mail to turbo1dr@cox.net 8)

Thank YOU!!!

1227148
78 Malibu 1.43 6.53 107 MPH(8th mile)
Image
User avatar
Mangus
TunerPro Author
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:49 pm

Post by Mangus »

If I get some time, I'll make one for you.
***************************************
TunerPro Author
1989 Trans Am
Turbo1dr
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:20 pm
Contact:

Post by Turbo1dr »

Thank You very much! 8)

I'd be willing to pay you for your time! Just PM me the price. Thanks again!
78 Malibu 1.43 6.53 107 MPH(8th mile)
Image
User avatar
Mangus
TunerPro Author
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:49 pm

Post by Mangus »

$7,203.26

:-)
***************************************
TunerPro Author
1989 Trans Am
SRP
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:19 pm
Location: Franklin,OH
Contact:

Post by SRP »

I would also like to have one and does anyone have an XDF yet?
Thanks,
Tracey Scott
Image
Scott racing and Performance
www.ts-performance.com
513-489-1197
Turbo1dr
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:20 pm
Contact:

Post by Turbo1dr »

Mangus wrote:$7,203.26

:-)
Gawd! :shock: I suppose if it helps me save my engine it would be worth it! :lol:


SRP, I have a highly detailed XDF. You'll love it!
78 Malibu 1.43 6.53 107 MPH(8th mile)
Image
SRP
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:19 pm
Location: Franklin,OH
Contact:

Post by SRP »

Hey I got your mail. Looks great. Now if we can just get the datastream we will be ready for action. This will save us a lot of work on our upcoming shop LC2 Swap project.
Thanks,
Tracey Scott
Image
Scott racing and Performance
www.ts-performance.com
513-489-1197
Turbo1dr
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:20 pm
Contact:

Post by Turbo1dr »

Mangus,

Have you done anything with the 86, 87 & 89 turbo regal .ads file? Just checking.

Thanks!
78 Malibu 1.43 6.53 107 MPH(8th mile)
Image
User avatar
Mangus
TunerPro Author
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:49 pm

Post by Mangus »

Sorry. How lame am I? 3 weeks? =(

It's on the definitions page now on the main site.

Direct link:
http://www.supportfitness.com/mark/tune ... TBuick.ads

Try it out. I quickly created it so there may be issues.
***************************************
TunerPro Author
1989 Trans Am
User avatar
turbo5
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 1:55 pm

Post by turbo5 »

Hey Turbo1dr,

Can I get a copy of your TR XDF file :?:

Thanks,
T5
Turbo1dr wrote:
Mangus wrote:$7,203.26

:-)
Gawd! :shock: I suppose if it helps me save my engine it would be worth it! :lol:


SRP, I have a highly detailed XDF. You'll love it!
Turbo1dr
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:20 pm
Contact:

Post by Turbo1dr »

turbo5 wrote:Hey Turbo1dr,

Can I get a copy of your TR XDF file :?:

Thanks,
T5
I'll need your e-mail address.
78 Malibu 1.43 6.53 107 MPH(8th mile)
Image
turbodig
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:21 pm

Post by turbodig »

Turbo1dr wrote:
turbo5 wrote:Hey Turbo1dr,

Can I get a copy of your TR XDF file :?:

Thanks,
T5
I'll need your e-mail address.

Could you fire me a copy as well?

turbodig atsign yahoo dot com

Sorry about the oddball format, keeps the spammers away.

Thanks,

Dig
SPOOLD U
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:09 pm

Post by SPOOLD U »

Does anyone have a successfully working turbo buick XDF/BIN combo? I've downloaded some stuff off the moates site but nothing seems to match up to make sense
Turbo1dr
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:20 pm
Contact:

Post by Turbo1dr »

Don't know why it doesn't work. I read my existing chip using a pocket programmer and then saved the .bin file. After that I loaded it into TunerPro.
78 Malibu 1.43 6.53 107 MPH(8th mile)
Image
SPOOLD U
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:09 pm

Post by SPOOLD U »

Turbo1dr wrote:Don't know why it doesn't work. I read my existing chip using a pocket programmer and then saved the .bin file. After that I loaded it into TunerPro.
well that's one thing i'm actually not sure of. I do a lot of DSM chip stuff and a guy I did a tune for asked me if i could do his grand nationals the same way, so I was looking into it. I'm not very familiar with the what the tables/values are supposed to look like, but just at a glance it doesn't look right at all except maybe the spark tables. there's a lot of very very very low numbers, decimal numbers, etc in the tables and values that look to me like they don't belong.
Jcrow
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:47 am
Location: Buffalo

Post by Jcrow »

I also would like to see a turbo regal definition. Does anybody know what type of output a turbo regal MAF has? Is it 0-5V or frequency?
'89 Cutlass 3.1
'90 GMC 4X4 5.7
'86 Vette
User avatar
Mangus
TunerPro Author
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:49 pm

Post by Mangus »

Jcrow wrote:I also would like to see a turbo regal definition. Does anybody know what type of output a turbo regal MAF has? Is it 0-5V or frequency?
http://www.tunerpro.net/downloadBinDefs.htm

0-5v
***************************************
TunerPro Author
1989 Trans Am
Jcrow
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:47 am
Location: Buffalo

Post by Jcrow »

Ok, i'm trying to figure if there is any difference between an '86 turbo regal MAF and a '86 vette MAF. They do have different part numbers on autozone.com
I would like to turbo my corvette
'89 Cutlass 3.1
'90 GMC 4X4 5.7
'86 Vette
liquidh8
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:09 pm

turbo1dr

Post by liquidh8 »

Do you think I could get a copy of that xdf? I would appreciate it. I have a few different ones, and a HACK, but I am not entirely sure what I have is correct. Some of the tables are looking a bit funny. There isn't alot of support for DIY GN chip work.

Thanks sir

email:
liquidh8 at hotmail
Post Reply