TunerPro User Forum

This is not currently possible. Solving this would not be straightforward. The best you can do today is to open a second instance of TunerPro, and load the second XDF in the second instance.

Will do.

Thank you for the suggestion!

Thank you for sending the video. The change you make in an editor is not committed to the bin until you hit the save button in the editor. As stated, you will then be prompted to update the other window with the new contents. Your video shows this happening has expected.

Can you isolate the last 3 or 4 actions you're taking before the crash? For example, with <bin X> and <XDF Y> open, modify <scalar or table cells x y z>, hit save in the scalar/table editor, save bin, crash. Then email me the files and the repro steps and I'll take a look. Specifics are critically i...

It is difficult for me to understand what you are describing, but if you have two XDF items open that reference the same address, changing one should indeed update the other already, or prompt the user before refreshing if the other has also been modified. If you have an example of where this is not...

DrInfinity wrote: ↑Tue Aug 26, 2025 10:02 am Is it possible to add copying the table to the Windows clipboard along with the axes, and leave the insertion without the axes?

Sure, but why did you ask here in an unrelated thread?

If you change the value of the item that has a conversion, then save it, then re-open the editor, does it work? =(

Is the "working" one floating point, or just 32-bit integer/unsigned? And is it actually working, in that you see the conversion being applied?

What you're seeing is currently by design. You cannot have a conversion for 32-bit floating point values. At some point in the future I will add support for this by adding two-way conversion.

No, there's no limit to the number of changes. What do you see after you make your changes to the file, save the file to disk (file->save as), then open the original as a compare bin and compare the changes (Ctrl + T)? Do you see the expected differences?

Where is your downloads folder? Does your user folder have any strange characters in your username? Sounds like a red herring. The XDF you sent loads fine for me from my desktop, from the downloads folder, from the documents folder, and various other folders (including deep structures) that I've now...

No, the size probably isn't the issue. Some other aspect of the XDFs that are crashing is the problem, specific to those files. Zip up the file and email it to me.

Opening an XDF is something everyone does, so it'd be strange for this to be a core issue and only be hearing about it now. Perhaps it's a problem with the XDF download process you're using. Can you open the 6E.xdf that's in the documents\tunerpro files\ folder? For an XDF that crashes, if you open ...

Tools->Custom Tools->New TunerPro Instance.

You can also create a shortcut to launch instances manually. Add the switch '-multiinstance' to the shortcut path.

Example: in the shortcut's target property, set it to "C:\Program Files (x86)\TunerPro RT\TunerPro.exe” -multiinstance

https://tunerpro.net/pluginDevelopment.htm

Decipha is correct - this would cause other problems for some hardware.

Instead, why not assign a keyboard shortcut in TunerPro to release of the hardware? The option is there.

What happens when you right click in the monitor and add a value to monitor?

Thank you for the suggestion.

It's a good request. I've added it to the list, thank you.

Only other suggestion is removing the .dat files while TunerPro is closed as recommended above. You mentioned it closing after selecting the xdf.

There’s a problem with the XDF. Feel free to email it to me.

The workspace itself should show its own scroll bar in these situations to allow you to scroll to the edges of the table editor itself. Your screenshots are cut off.

Thanks!

On the per-table basis, is reversing the order of row/col cells defined in the table (and/or adjusting step) insufficient? If there's a global setting for this and a per-table setting as you suggest, how should those be combined? If the global setting is set to reverse, and the table is set to rever...

Yes, this is on my list of things to do. Thanks!

Is it your intent to add your CSV importer to TunerPro? If so, I'd be happy to use your code as a reference to potentially add this functionality natively.

Yes, I agree, this has been on my list. Thanks!

Thanks! I'll take a look and fix what I find.

This should be fixed now, as of build 5.00.9786.00. Is it not?

They should fix their firmware, as I believe the fix on the TunerPro side wouldn't be fair to other manufacturers.

Can you please email me an example, so that I can fix this?

New build is now available. www.tunerpro.net/downloadApp.htm

Finally came across a repro (this also seems to be tied to the graphics configuration - my Win10 laptop on its own did not repro, but when I hooked it up to an external monitor, I could get it to repro). I have a fix for the next build, hopefully out in the next week or so. This seems to be a bug in...

Thank you. I'll look into the issue.

The hardware has to support address hit tracing, and in this case, has to implement the appropriate commands for it to be enabled.

This is Major Stride.

Ah, no, it's not corruption. It's a change in Windows that has exposed a bug either in TunerPro, or in the Windows control or runtime. As soon as I can get a repro, I can fix it. I'm taking opportunities to try it on machines that I have access to.

Sorry, I don't follow. What file? This isn't an issue with any of the files.

I'm not entirely surprised that this would be tied to OS or the runtime, which explains why not everyone is seeing it. I'm still unable to repro on every one of the 8+ machines I've tried it on.

Not yet. Out of curiosity, are you also a Reflex user? So far, the reports I've received are from those using the Motiv definitions. I'm guessing those definitions are exposing an underlying bug in my code.

Thanks for the info. This was difficult to work out last time, first because I couldn't repro, and then when I could, it was a pain to figure out the cause. Here's hoping I can find a way to reproduce this.

Will keep looking.

Thanks for reporting this. I'm not sure what the issue could be. I've tried to reproduce this on a couple of machines I have available to me and cannot. I'll peruse the code, my changes, and continue to try to figure out why this might be happening for you or your customer (I received an email with ...

I'm sorry, I don't understand the request. Processor access?

I don't believe that's coming from TunerPro, but I don't know what it would be coming from. Perhaps the XDF is loading a checksum plug-in that has a dependency? Perhaps something more nefarious like a virus? Sorry I can't help more directly.

When both are 0, the output should be 0%. I'll fix that case.

I would assert that this is the desired behavior. If the original value is 0, but the compare value is, say, 20, what is the percent difference? If the original value is 20, but the compare value is 0, what is the percent difference? Mathematically, they're infinity which has no meaning in percentag...

Where [0:2] means bits 0 through 2? That's a tidy solution.

I'll think about other ways to handle this. One way might be for me to add nibble support - for size, the option are currently 32, 16, 8 bit. I could add 4 bit upper nibble and 4 bit lower nibble. Something like that. It's really rare, though. Probably better to go for the flexible solution. I'll th...

This looks like it's probably a side effect of the way that I convert value entered in the editor back to the stored value. The algorithm isn't really designed with binary operators (and other situations, like multi-root equations), which is a problem in this case. What I've had on my list to do is ...

Search found 1958 matches